Editor decisions: the wording tells you what to do next, if you read it precisely

Editorial decision letters use a small vocabulary with precise meanings — and authors who read them loosely either give up on a paper that was invited back, or resubmit unchanged a paper that needed rebuilding.

The decisions

• Accept: rare on first submission.
• Minor revision: almost certainly accepted after you address the points.
• Major revision: substantial work needed, outcome genuinely uncertain.
• Reject and resubmit: treated as a new submission, but they want to see it again.
• Reject: this journal is finished with it.

Reject and resubmit is an invitation

• The editor is telling you the work could fit after major change.
• It is much closer to major revision than to rejection.
• Many authors abandon papers at this point unnecessarily.

Two kinds of rejection

• Desk rejection on scope: send elsewhere almost unchanged.
• Rejection after review: there are real comments to address first.
• Resubmitting elsewhere unchanged usually meets the same comments again.

Read the editor's own words

• The editor's letter, not the reviews, states the decision's reasoning.
• It often signals which reviewer comments matter most.
• Address those first in any revision.

Timing

• Revision deadlines are usually extendable if you ask before they pass.
• Ask early rather than missing the deadline silently.
• A missed deadline can convert the paper into a new submission.

One thing worth remembering

Treat reject and resubmit as an invitation, not a rejection.

The editor is telling you they would consider the work again after substantial change — and abandoning the paper at that point discards the most useful signal you have received about it.

Câu hỏi thường gặp